Peer Review Process
The Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (JoICIS) follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. The review process is as follows:
-
Initial Submission Check
- The editorial team evaluates the submitted manuscript for completeness, scope alignment, and compliance with the journal's guidelines.
- Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s criteria may be desk-rejected or returned to the authors for revisions.
-
Double-Blind Peer Review
- Each manuscript is assigned to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
- Both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous to ensure an unbiased evaluation.
-
Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:- Originality and significance of the research
- Clarity and coherence of the presentation
- Methodological soundness and technical accuracy
- Relevance to the journal’s scope and contribution to the field
- Proper citation of references and ethical considerations
-
Decision Process
Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief makes one of the following decisions:- Accepted: The manuscript is accepted with minor or no revisions.
- Revisions Required: Authors must make minor or major revisions before acceptance.
- Resubmit for Review: A substantially revised version must be re-evaluated.
- Rejected: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s quality standards or falls outside the journal’s scope.
-
Revision and Final Decision
- If revisions are requested, authors are given a deadline to submit a revised manuscript.
- The revised submission may be reviewed again by the same reviewers or the editorial team.
- A final decision is made based on the completeness and quality of the revisions.
-
Publication
- Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes copyediting and formatting before publication.
- The final version is published under an open-access license, making it freely available to the public.
JoICIS is committed to maintaining a high standard of peer review, ensuring that all published articles contribute significantly to the advancement of computer science and information systems.